Comparison of 8 versus 16 minutes heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation

Marlies Y. Bongers, Ben W J Mol, Hans A M Brölmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min of heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation. Between 1995 and 1998, women with menorrhagia consecutively scheduled for endometrial ablation with hot fluid balloon were included in a prospective study. The effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min heating time on surgical reintervention and patients' satisfaction was evaluated. Of the 130 women in the study, 63 had endometrial heating for 8 min, whereas 67 patients had endometrial heating for 16 min. Hysteroscopy performed immediately after the procedure showed an evident thermic effect on both the anterior uterine wall and the fundal region in the two groups. The posterior wall was still vital in 25% of the patients after treatment for 8 min, whereas this percentage was only 8% in the 16-min group. This difference was not statistically significant. Failure rates of the hot fluid balloon therapy, defined as either hysterectomy or dissatisfaction with the treatment result, were not significantly different (hazard rate ratio 1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.2). This-study shows that there is no advantage in doubling the heating period of the balloon ablation therapy from 8 to 16 min.

LanguageEnglish
Pages143-148
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gynecologic Surgery
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Mol, Ben W J ; Brölmann, Hans A M. / Comparison of 8 versus 16 minutes heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation. In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. 1999 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 143-148.
@article{5fb316b7b17d4e789a9e69e1a7f21671,
title = "Comparison of 8 versus 16 minutes heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min of heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation. Between 1995 and 1998, women with menorrhagia consecutively scheduled for endometrial ablation with hot fluid balloon were included in a prospective study. The effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min heating time on surgical reintervention and patients' satisfaction was evaluated. Of the 130 women in the study, 63 had endometrial heating for 8 min, whereas 67 patients had endometrial heating for 16 min. Hysteroscopy performed immediately after the procedure showed an evident thermic effect on both the anterior uterine wall and the fundal region in the two groups. The posterior wall was still vital in 25{\%} of the patients after treatment for 8 min, whereas this percentage was only 8{\%} in the 16-min group. This difference was not statistically significant. Failure rates of the hot fluid balloon therapy, defined as either hysterectomy or dissatisfaction with the treatment result, were not significantly different (hazard rate ratio 1.0; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.93-1.2). This-study shows that there is no advantage in doubling the heating period of the balloon ablation therapy from 8 to 16 min.",
author = "Bongers, {Marlies Y.} and Mol, {Ben W J} and Br{\"o}lmann, {Hans A M}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1089/gyn.1999.15.143",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "143--148",
journal = "Journal of Gynecologic Surgery",
issn = "1042-4067",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Comparison of 8 versus 16 minutes heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation. / Bongers, Marlies Y.; Mol, Ben W J; Brölmann, Hans A M.

In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1999, p. 143-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 8 versus 16 minutes heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation

AU - Bongers, Marlies Y.

AU - Mol, Ben W J

AU - Brölmann, Hans A M

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min of heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation. Between 1995 and 1998, women with menorrhagia consecutively scheduled for endometrial ablation with hot fluid balloon were included in a prospective study. The effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min heating time on surgical reintervention and patients' satisfaction was evaluated. Of the 130 women in the study, 63 had endometrial heating for 8 min, whereas 67 patients had endometrial heating for 16 min. Hysteroscopy performed immediately after the procedure showed an evident thermic effect on both the anterior uterine wall and the fundal region in the two groups. The posterior wall was still vital in 25% of the patients after treatment for 8 min, whereas this percentage was only 8% in the 16-min group. This difference was not statistically significant. Failure rates of the hot fluid balloon therapy, defined as either hysterectomy or dissatisfaction with the treatment result, were not significantly different (hazard rate ratio 1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.2). This-study shows that there is no advantage in doubling the heating period of the balloon ablation therapy from 8 to 16 min.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min of heating in the treatment of menorrhagia with hot fluid balloon ablation. Between 1995 and 1998, women with menorrhagia consecutively scheduled for endometrial ablation with hot fluid balloon were included in a prospective study. The effectiveness of 8 versus 16 min heating time on surgical reintervention and patients' satisfaction was evaluated. Of the 130 women in the study, 63 had endometrial heating for 8 min, whereas 67 patients had endometrial heating for 16 min. Hysteroscopy performed immediately after the procedure showed an evident thermic effect on both the anterior uterine wall and the fundal region in the two groups. The posterior wall was still vital in 25% of the patients after treatment for 8 min, whereas this percentage was only 8% in the 16-min group. This difference was not statistically significant. Failure rates of the hot fluid balloon therapy, defined as either hysterectomy or dissatisfaction with the treatment result, were not significantly different (hazard rate ratio 1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.2). This-study shows that there is no advantage in doubling the heating period of the balloon ablation therapy from 8 to 16 min.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032801827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/gyn.1999.15.143

DO - 10.1089/gyn.1999.15.143

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 143

EP - 148

JO - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

T2 - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

JF - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

SN - 1042-4067

IS - 3

ER -