Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations

Grant D. Brinkworth, Manny Noakes, Peter M. Clifton, Anthony R. Bird

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

129 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Very low-carbohydrate diets are often used to promote weight loss, but their effects on bowel health and function are largely unknown. We compared the effects of a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LC) diet with a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat (HC) diet on indices of bowel health and function. In a parallel study design, ninety-one overweight and obese participants (age 5006 (sd 7.5) years; BMI 33.7 (sd 4.2) kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (about 6-7 MJ, 30 % deficit) planned isoenergetic LC or HC diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, 24 h urine and faecal collections were obtained and a bowel function questionnaire was completed. Compared with the HC group, there were significant reductions in the LC group for faecal output (21 (sd 145) v. -61 (sd 147) g), defecation frequency, faecal excretion and concentrations of butyrate -0.5 (sd 10.4) v. -3.9 (sd 9.7) mmol/l) and total SCFA (1.4 (sd 40.5) v. -15.8 (sd 43.6) mmol/l) and counts of bifidobacteria (P<0.05 time × diet interaction, for all). Urinary phenols and p-cresol excretion decreased (P≤0.003 for time) with no difference between diets (P≥0.25). Faecal form, pH, ammonia concentration and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli did not change with either diet. No differences between the diets were evident for incidences of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, which suggests that both diets were well tolerated. Under energy-restricted conditions, a short-term LC diet lowered stool weight and had detrimental effects on the concentration and excretion of faecal SCFA compared with an HC diet. This suggests that the long-term consumption of an LC diet may increase the risk of development of gastrointestinal disorders.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1493-1502
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume101
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bowel health
  • Dietary fibre
  • Ketogenic diets
  • Low-carbohydrate diets
  • Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

@article{1a5b926f36b44a1c81db6beac41058b0,
title = "Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations",
abstract = "Very low-carbohydrate diets are often used to promote weight loss, but their effects on bowel health and function are largely unknown. We compared the effects of a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LC) diet with a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat (HC) diet on indices of bowel health and function. In a parallel study design, ninety-one overweight and obese participants (age 5006 (sd 7.5) years; BMI 33.7 (sd 4.2) kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (about 6-7 MJ, 30 {\%} deficit) planned isoenergetic LC or HC diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, 24 h urine and faecal collections were obtained and a bowel function questionnaire was completed. Compared with the HC group, there were significant reductions in the LC group for faecal output (21 (sd 145) v. -61 (sd 147) g), defecation frequency, faecal excretion and concentrations of butyrate -0.5 (sd 10.4) v. -3.9 (sd 9.7) mmol/l) and total SCFA (1.4 (sd 40.5) v. -15.8 (sd 43.6) mmol/l) and counts of bifidobacteria (P<0.05 time × diet interaction, for all). Urinary phenols and p-cresol excretion decreased (P≤0.003 for time) with no difference between diets (P≥0.25). Faecal form, pH, ammonia concentration and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli did not change with either diet. No differences between the diets were evident for incidences of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, which suggests that both diets were well tolerated. Under energy-restricted conditions, a short-term LC diet lowered stool weight and had detrimental effects on the concentration and excretion of faecal SCFA compared with an HC diet. This suggests that the long-term consumption of an LC diet may increase the risk of development of gastrointestinal disorders.",
keywords = "Bowel health, Dietary fibre, Ketogenic diets, Low-carbohydrate diets, Obesity",
author = "Brinkworth, {Grant D.} and Manny Noakes and Clifton, {Peter M.} and Bird, {Anthony R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S0007114508094658",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "1493--1502",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "10",

}

Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations. / Brinkworth, Grant D.; Noakes, Manny; Clifton, Peter M.; Bird, Anthony R.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 101, No. 10, 03.07.2009, p. 1493-1502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations

AU - Brinkworth, Grant D.

AU - Noakes, Manny

AU - Clifton, Peter M.

AU - Bird, Anthony R.

PY - 2009/7/3

Y1 - 2009/7/3

N2 - Very low-carbohydrate diets are often used to promote weight loss, but their effects on bowel health and function are largely unknown. We compared the effects of a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LC) diet with a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat (HC) diet on indices of bowel health and function. In a parallel study design, ninety-one overweight and obese participants (age 5006 (sd 7.5) years; BMI 33.7 (sd 4.2) kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (about 6-7 MJ, 30 % deficit) planned isoenergetic LC or HC diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, 24 h urine and faecal collections were obtained and a bowel function questionnaire was completed. Compared with the HC group, there were significant reductions in the LC group for faecal output (21 (sd 145) v. -61 (sd 147) g), defecation frequency, faecal excretion and concentrations of butyrate -0.5 (sd 10.4) v. -3.9 (sd 9.7) mmol/l) and total SCFA (1.4 (sd 40.5) v. -15.8 (sd 43.6) mmol/l) and counts of bifidobacteria (P<0.05 time × diet interaction, for all). Urinary phenols and p-cresol excretion decreased (P≤0.003 for time) with no difference between diets (P≥0.25). Faecal form, pH, ammonia concentration and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli did not change with either diet. No differences between the diets were evident for incidences of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, which suggests that both diets were well tolerated. Under energy-restricted conditions, a short-term LC diet lowered stool weight and had detrimental effects on the concentration and excretion of faecal SCFA compared with an HC diet. This suggests that the long-term consumption of an LC diet may increase the risk of development of gastrointestinal disorders.

AB - Very low-carbohydrate diets are often used to promote weight loss, but their effects on bowel health and function are largely unknown. We compared the effects of a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LC) diet with a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat (HC) diet on indices of bowel health and function. In a parallel study design, ninety-one overweight and obese participants (age 5006 (sd 7.5) years; BMI 33.7 (sd 4.2) kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (about 6-7 MJ, 30 % deficit) planned isoenergetic LC or HC diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, 24 h urine and faecal collections were obtained and a bowel function questionnaire was completed. Compared with the HC group, there were significant reductions in the LC group for faecal output (21 (sd 145) v. -61 (sd 147) g), defecation frequency, faecal excretion and concentrations of butyrate -0.5 (sd 10.4) v. -3.9 (sd 9.7) mmol/l) and total SCFA (1.4 (sd 40.5) v. -15.8 (sd 43.6) mmol/l) and counts of bifidobacteria (P<0.05 time × diet interaction, for all). Urinary phenols and p-cresol excretion decreased (P≤0.003 for time) with no difference between diets (P≥0.25). Faecal form, pH, ammonia concentration and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli did not change with either diet. No differences between the diets were evident for incidences of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, which suggests that both diets were well tolerated. Under energy-restricted conditions, a short-term LC diet lowered stool weight and had detrimental effects on the concentration and excretion of faecal SCFA compared with an HC diet. This suggests that the long-term consumption of an LC diet may increase the risk of development of gastrointestinal disorders.

KW - Bowel health

KW - Dietary fibre

KW - Ketogenic diets

KW - Low-carbohydrate diets

KW - Obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649422301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114508094658

DO - 10.1017/S0007114508094658

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 1493

EP - 1502

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

T2 - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 10

ER -