Caloric restriction with or without exercise: The fitness versus fatness debate

D. Enette Larson-Meyer, Leanne Redman, Leonie Heilbronn, Corby K. Martin, Eric Ravussin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a debate over the independent effects of aerobic fitness and body fatness on mortality and disease risks. PURPOSE: To determine whether a 25% energy deficit that produces equal change in body fatness leads to greater cardiometabolic benefits when aerobic exercise is included. METHODS: Thirty-six overweight participants (16 males/20 females) (39 ± 1 yr; 82 ± 2 kg; body mass index = 27.8 ± 0.3 kg•m, mean ± SEM) were randomized to one of three groups (n = 12 for each) for a 6-month intervention: control (CO, weight-maintenance diet), caloric restriction (CR, 25% reduction in energy intake), or caloric restriction plus aerobic exercise (CR + EX, 12.5% reduction in energy intake plus 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure). Food was provided during weeks 1-12 and 22-24. Changes in fat mass, visceral fat, V̇O2peak (graded treadmill test), muscular strength (isokinetic knee extension/flexion), blood lipids, blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity/secretion were compared. RESULTS: As expected, V̇O2peak was significantly improved after 6 months of intervention in CR + EX only (22 ± 5% vs 7 ± 5% in CR and-5 ± 3% in CO), whereas isokinetic muscular strength did not change. There was no difference in the losses of weight, fat mass, or visceral fat and changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) between the intervention groups. However, only CR + EX had a significant decrease in diastolic BP (-5 ± 3% vs-2 ± 2% in CR and-1 ± 2% in CO), in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-13 ± 4% vs-6 ± 3% in CR and 2 ± 4% in CO), and a significant increase in insulin sensitivity (66 ± 22% vs 40 ± 20% in CR and 1 ± 11% in CO). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar effect on fat losses, combining CR with exercise increased aerobic fitness in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, LDL cholesterol, and diastolic BP. The results lend support for inclusion of an exercise component in weight loss programs to improve metabolic fitness.

LanguageEnglish
Pages152-159
Number of pages8
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Blood lipids
  • Blood pressure
  • Energy restriction
  • Exercise training
  • Maximal aerobic fitness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Larson-Meyer, D. Enette ; Redman, Leanne ; Heilbronn, Leonie ; Martin, Corby K. ; Ravussin, Eric. / Caloric restriction with or without exercise : The fitness versus fatness debate. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 152-159.
@article{d68c2b7ac2ae4c2483203b457cd16328,
title = "Caloric restriction with or without exercise: The fitness versus fatness debate",
abstract = "There is a debate over the independent effects of aerobic fitness and body fatness on mortality and disease risks. PURPOSE: To determine whether a 25{\%} energy deficit that produces equal change in body fatness leads to greater cardiometabolic benefits when aerobic exercise is included. METHODS: Thirty-six overweight participants (16 males/20 females) (39 ± 1 yr; 82 ± 2 kg; body mass index = 27.8 ± 0.3 kg•m, mean ± SEM) were randomized to one of three groups (n = 12 for each) for a 6-month intervention: control (CO, weight-maintenance diet), caloric restriction (CR, 25{\%} reduction in energy intake), or caloric restriction plus aerobic exercise (CR + EX, 12.5{\%} reduction in energy intake plus 12.5{\%} increase in exercise energy expenditure). Food was provided during weeks 1-12 and 22-24. Changes in fat mass, visceral fat, V̇O2peak (graded treadmill test), muscular strength (isokinetic knee extension/flexion), blood lipids, blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity/secretion were compared. RESULTS: As expected, V̇O2peak was significantly improved after 6 months of intervention in CR + EX only (22 ± 5{\%} vs 7 ± 5{\%} in CR and-5 ± 3{\%} in CO), whereas isokinetic muscular strength did not change. There was no difference in the losses of weight, fat mass, or visceral fat and changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) between the intervention groups. However, only CR + EX had a significant decrease in diastolic BP (-5 ± 3{\%} vs-2 ± 2{\%} in CR and-1 ± 2{\%} in CO), in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-13 ± 4{\%} vs-6 ± 3{\%} in CR and 2 ± 4{\%} in CO), and a significant increase in insulin sensitivity (66 ± 22{\%} vs 40 ± 20{\%} in CR and 1 ± 11{\%} in CO). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar effect on fat losses, combining CR with exercise increased aerobic fitness in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, LDL cholesterol, and diastolic BP. The results lend support for inclusion of an exercise component in weight loss programs to improve metabolic fitness.",
keywords = "Blood lipids, Blood pressure, Energy restriction, Exercise training, Maximal aerobic fitness",
author = "Larson-Meyer, {D. Enette} and Leanne Redman and Leonie Heilbronn and Martin, {Corby K.} and Eric Ravussin",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ad7f17",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "152--159",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Caloric restriction with or without exercise : The fitness versus fatness debate. / Larson-Meyer, D. Enette; Redman, Leanne; Heilbronn, Leonie; Martin, Corby K.; Ravussin, Eric.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 152-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caloric restriction with or without exercise

T2 - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

AU - Larson-Meyer, D. Enette

AU - Redman, Leanne

AU - Heilbronn, Leonie

AU - Martin, Corby K.

AU - Ravussin, Eric

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - There is a debate over the independent effects of aerobic fitness and body fatness on mortality and disease risks. PURPOSE: To determine whether a 25% energy deficit that produces equal change in body fatness leads to greater cardiometabolic benefits when aerobic exercise is included. METHODS: Thirty-six overweight participants (16 males/20 females) (39 ± 1 yr; 82 ± 2 kg; body mass index = 27.8 ± 0.3 kg•m, mean ± SEM) were randomized to one of three groups (n = 12 for each) for a 6-month intervention: control (CO, weight-maintenance diet), caloric restriction (CR, 25% reduction in energy intake), or caloric restriction plus aerobic exercise (CR + EX, 12.5% reduction in energy intake plus 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure). Food was provided during weeks 1-12 and 22-24. Changes in fat mass, visceral fat, V̇O2peak (graded treadmill test), muscular strength (isokinetic knee extension/flexion), blood lipids, blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity/secretion were compared. RESULTS: As expected, V̇O2peak was significantly improved after 6 months of intervention in CR + EX only (22 ± 5% vs 7 ± 5% in CR and-5 ± 3% in CO), whereas isokinetic muscular strength did not change. There was no difference in the losses of weight, fat mass, or visceral fat and changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) between the intervention groups. However, only CR + EX had a significant decrease in diastolic BP (-5 ± 3% vs-2 ± 2% in CR and-1 ± 2% in CO), in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-13 ± 4% vs-6 ± 3% in CR and 2 ± 4% in CO), and a significant increase in insulin sensitivity (66 ± 22% vs 40 ± 20% in CR and 1 ± 11% in CO). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar effect on fat losses, combining CR with exercise increased aerobic fitness in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, LDL cholesterol, and diastolic BP. The results lend support for inclusion of an exercise component in weight loss programs to improve metabolic fitness.

AB - There is a debate over the independent effects of aerobic fitness and body fatness on mortality and disease risks. PURPOSE: To determine whether a 25% energy deficit that produces equal change in body fatness leads to greater cardiometabolic benefits when aerobic exercise is included. METHODS: Thirty-six overweight participants (16 males/20 females) (39 ± 1 yr; 82 ± 2 kg; body mass index = 27.8 ± 0.3 kg•m, mean ± SEM) were randomized to one of three groups (n = 12 for each) for a 6-month intervention: control (CO, weight-maintenance diet), caloric restriction (CR, 25% reduction in energy intake), or caloric restriction plus aerobic exercise (CR + EX, 12.5% reduction in energy intake plus 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure). Food was provided during weeks 1-12 and 22-24. Changes in fat mass, visceral fat, V̇O2peak (graded treadmill test), muscular strength (isokinetic knee extension/flexion), blood lipids, blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity/secretion were compared. RESULTS: As expected, V̇O2peak was significantly improved after 6 months of intervention in CR + EX only (22 ± 5% vs 7 ± 5% in CR and-5 ± 3% in CO), whereas isokinetic muscular strength did not change. There was no difference in the losses of weight, fat mass, or visceral fat and changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) between the intervention groups. However, only CR + EX had a significant decrease in diastolic BP (-5 ± 3% vs-2 ± 2% in CR and-1 ± 2% in CO), in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-13 ± 4% vs-6 ± 3% in CR and 2 ± 4% in CO), and a significant increase in insulin sensitivity (66 ± 22% vs 40 ± 20% in CR and 1 ± 11% in CO). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar effect on fat losses, combining CR with exercise increased aerobic fitness in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, LDL cholesterol, and diastolic BP. The results lend support for inclusion of an exercise component in weight loss programs to improve metabolic fitness.

KW - Blood lipids

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Energy restriction

KW - Exercise training

KW - Maximal aerobic fitness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73449111908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ad7f17

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ad7f17

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 152

EP - 159

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 1

ER -