Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials

T. P. Bernardes, K. Broekhuijsen, C. M. Koopmans, K. E. Boers, L. van Wyk, P. Tajik, M. G. van Pampus, S. A. Scherjon, B. W. Mol, M. T. Franssen, P. P. van den Berg, H. Groen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate caesarean section and adverse neonatal outcome rates after induction of labour or expectant management in women with an unripe cervix at or near term. Design: Secondary analysis of data from two randomised clinical trials. Setting: Data were collected in two nationwide Dutch trials. Population: Women with hypertensive disease (HYPITAT trial) or suspected fetal growth restriction (DIGITAT trial) and a Bishop score ≤6. Methods: Comparison of outcomes after induction of labour and expectant management. Main outcome measures: Rates of caesarean section and adverse neonatal outcome, defined as 5-minute Apgar score ≤6 and/or arterial umbilical cord pH <7.05 and/or neonatal intensive care unit admission and/or seizures and/or perinatal death. Results: Of 1172 included women with an unripe cervix, 572 had induction of labour and 600 had expectant management. We found no significant difference in the overall caesarean rate (difference −1.1%, 95% CI −5.4 to 3.2). Induction of labour did not increase caesarean rates in women with Bishop scores from 3 to 6 (difference −2.7%, 95% CI −7.6 to 2.2) or adverse neonatal outcome rates (difference −1.5%, 95% CI −4.3 to 1.3). However, there was a significant difference in the rates of arterial umbilical cord pH <7.05 favouring induction (difference −3.2%, 95% CI −5.6 to −0.9). The number needed to treat to prevent one case of umbilical arterial pH <7.05 was 32. Conclusions: We found no evidence that induction of labour increases the caesarean rate or compromises neonatal outcome as compared with expectant management. Concerns over increased risk of failed induction in women with a Bishop score from 3 to 6 seem unwarranted. Tweetable abstract: Induction of labour at low Bishop scores does not increase caesarean section rate or poor neonatal outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1501-1508
Number of pages8
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume123
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Keywords

  • Cervical ripeness
  • expectant management
  • fetal growth restriction
  • hypertensive disease
  • induction of labour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this