Bone to pick: The importance of evaluating reference genes for RT-qPCR quantification of gene expression in craniosynostosis and bone-related tissues and cells

Xianxian Yang, Jodie T. Hatfield, Susan J. Hinze, Xiongzheng Mu, Peter Anderson, Barry C. Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: RT-qPCR is a common tool for quantification of gene expression, but its accuracy is dependent on the choice and stability (steady state expression levels) of the reference gene/s used for normalization. To date, in the bone field, there have been few studies to determine the most stable reference genes and, usually, RT-qPCR data is normalised to non-validated reference genes, most commonly GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA. Here we draw attention to the potential deleterious impact of using classical reference genes to normalise expression data for bone studies without prior validation of their stability. Results: Using the geNorm and Normfinder programs, panels of mouse and human genes were assessed for their stability under three different experimental conditions: 1) disease progression of Crouzon syndrome (craniosynostosis) in a mouse model, 2) proliferative culture of cranial suture cells isolated from craniosynostosis patients and 3) osteogenesis of a mouse bone marrow stromal cell line. We demonstrate that classical reference genes are not always the most stable genes and that gene stability is highly dependent on experimental conditions. Selected stable genes, individually or in combination, were then used to normalise osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase gene expression data during cranial suture fusion in the craniosynostosis mouse model and strategies compared. Strikingly, the expression trends of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin varied significantly when normalised to the least stable, the most stable or the three most stable genes. Conclusion: To minimise errors in evaluating gene expression levels, analysis of a reference panel and subsequent normalization to several stable genes is strongly recommended over normalization to a single gene. In particular, we conclude that use of single, non-validated "housekeeping" genes such as GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA, currently a widespread practice by researchers in the bone field, is likely to produce data of questionable reliability when changes are 2 fold or less, and such data should be interpreted with due caution.

LanguageEnglish
Article number222
JournalBMC Research Notes
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2012

Keywords

  • -actin
  • 18S RNA
  • Alkaline phosphatase
  • Bone
  • Craniosynostosis
  • Gapdh
  • Mineralization
  • Normfinder
  • Osteocalcin
  • geNorm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

@article{da54b388eab64ecf92c21c65f8eeef62,
title = "Bone to pick: The importance of evaluating reference genes for RT-qPCR quantification of gene expression in craniosynostosis and bone-related tissues and cells",
abstract = "Background: RT-qPCR is a common tool for quantification of gene expression, but its accuracy is dependent on the choice and stability (steady state expression levels) of the reference gene/s used for normalization. To date, in the bone field, there have been few studies to determine the most stable reference genes and, usually, RT-qPCR data is normalised to non-validated reference genes, most commonly GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA. Here we draw attention to the potential deleterious impact of using classical reference genes to normalise expression data for bone studies without prior validation of their stability. Results: Using the geNorm and Normfinder programs, panels of mouse and human genes were assessed for their stability under three different experimental conditions: 1) disease progression of Crouzon syndrome (craniosynostosis) in a mouse model, 2) proliferative culture of cranial suture cells isolated from craniosynostosis patients and 3) osteogenesis of a mouse bone marrow stromal cell line. We demonstrate that classical reference genes are not always the most stable genes and that gene stability is highly dependent on experimental conditions. Selected stable genes, individually or in combination, were then used to normalise osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase gene expression data during cranial suture fusion in the craniosynostosis mouse model and strategies compared. Strikingly, the expression trends of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin varied significantly when normalised to the least stable, the most stable or the three most stable genes. Conclusion: To minimise errors in evaluating gene expression levels, analysis of a reference panel and subsequent normalization to several stable genes is strongly recommended over normalization to a single gene. In particular, we conclude that use of single, non-validated {"}housekeeping{"} genes such as GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA, currently a widespread practice by researchers in the bone field, is likely to produce data of questionable reliability when changes are 2 fold or less, and such data should be interpreted with due caution.",
keywords = "-actin, 18S RNA, Alkaline phosphatase, Bone, Craniosynostosis, Gapdh, Mineralization, Normfinder, Osteocalcin, geNorm",
author = "Xianxian Yang and Hatfield, {Jodie T.} and Hinze, {Susan J.} and Xiongzheng Mu and Peter Anderson and Powell, {Barry C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/1756-0500-5-222",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMC Research Notes",
issn = "1756-0500",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Bone to pick : The importance of evaluating reference genes for RT-qPCR quantification of gene expression in craniosynostosis and bone-related tissues and cells. / Yang, Xianxian; Hatfield, Jodie T.; Hinze, Susan J.; Mu, Xiongzheng; Anderson, Peter; Powell, Barry C.

In: BMC Research Notes, Vol. 5, 222, 09.05.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone to pick

T2 - BMC Research Notes

AU - Yang, Xianxian

AU - Hatfield, Jodie T.

AU - Hinze, Susan J.

AU - Mu, Xiongzheng

AU - Anderson, Peter

AU - Powell, Barry C.

PY - 2012/5/9

Y1 - 2012/5/9

N2 - Background: RT-qPCR is a common tool for quantification of gene expression, but its accuracy is dependent on the choice and stability (steady state expression levels) of the reference gene/s used for normalization. To date, in the bone field, there have been few studies to determine the most stable reference genes and, usually, RT-qPCR data is normalised to non-validated reference genes, most commonly GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA. Here we draw attention to the potential deleterious impact of using classical reference genes to normalise expression data for bone studies without prior validation of their stability. Results: Using the geNorm and Normfinder programs, panels of mouse and human genes were assessed for their stability under three different experimental conditions: 1) disease progression of Crouzon syndrome (craniosynostosis) in a mouse model, 2) proliferative culture of cranial suture cells isolated from craniosynostosis patients and 3) osteogenesis of a mouse bone marrow stromal cell line. We demonstrate that classical reference genes are not always the most stable genes and that gene stability is highly dependent on experimental conditions. Selected stable genes, individually or in combination, were then used to normalise osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase gene expression data during cranial suture fusion in the craniosynostosis mouse model and strategies compared. Strikingly, the expression trends of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin varied significantly when normalised to the least stable, the most stable or the three most stable genes. Conclusion: To minimise errors in evaluating gene expression levels, analysis of a reference panel and subsequent normalization to several stable genes is strongly recommended over normalization to a single gene. In particular, we conclude that use of single, non-validated "housekeeping" genes such as GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA, currently a widespread practice by researchers in the bone field, is likely to produce data of questionable reliability when changes are 2 fold or less, and such data should be interpreted with due caution.

AB - Background: RT-qPCR is a common tool for quantification of gene expression, but its accuracy is dependent on the choice and stability (steady state expression levels) of the reference gene/s used for normalization. To date, in the bone field, there have been few studies to determine the most stable reference genes and, usually, RT-qPCR data is normalised to non-validated reference genes, most commonly GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA. Here we draw attention to the potential deleterious impact of using classical reference genes to normalise expression data for bone studies without prior validation of their stability. Results: Using the geNorm and Normfinder programs, panels of mouse and human genes were assessed for their stability under three different experimental conditions: 1) disease progression of Crouzon syndrome (craniosynostosis) in a mouse model, 2) proliferative culture of cranial suture cells isolated from craniosynostosis patients and 3) osteogenesis of a mouse bone marrow stromal cell line. We demonstrate that classical reference genes are not always the most stable genes and that gene stability is highly dependent on experimental conditions. Selected stable genes, individually or in combination, were then used to normalise osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase gene expression data during cranial suture fusion in the craniosynostosis mouse model and strategies compared. Strikingly, the expression trends of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin varied significantly when normalised to the least stable, the most stable or the three most stable genes. Conclusion: To minimise errors in evaluating gene expression levels, analysis of a reference panel and subsequent normalization to several stable genes is strongly recommended over normalization to a single gene. In particular, we conclude that use of single, non-validated "housekeeping" genes such as GAPDH, ACTB and 18S rRNA, currently a widespread practice by researchers in the bone field, is likely to produce data of questionable reliability when changes are 2 fold or less, and such data should be interpreted with due caution.

KW - -actin

KW - 18S RNA

KW - Alkaline phosphatase

KW - Bone

KW - Craniosynostosis

KW - Gapdh

KW - Mineralization

KW - Normfinder

KW - Osteocalcin

KW - geNorm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860618669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1756-0500-5-222

DO - 10.1186/1756-0500-5-222

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - BMC Research Notes

JF - BMC Research Notes

SN - 1756-0500

M1 - 222

ER -