Atrial fibrillation burden and clinical outcomes in heart failure: the CASTLE-AF trial

Johannes Brachmann, Christian Sohns, Dietrich Andresen, Jürgen Siebels, Susanne Sehner, Luca Boersma, Béla Merkely, Evgeny Pokushalov, Prashanthan Sanders, Heribert Schunkert, Dietmar Bänsch, Lilas Dagher, Yan Zhao, Christian Mahnkopf, Karl Wegscheider, Nassir F. Marrouche

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: This subanalysis of the CASTLE-AF trial (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) aimed to address the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF burden, and hard clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with AF. Background: The CASTLE-AF trial demonstrated the benefit of CA compared to pharmacological treatment in decreasing mortality and CV hospitalizations in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, the impact of AF recurrence and AF burden after ablation on long-term treatment benefit remains unknown. Methods: The CASTLE-AF protocol randomized 363 patients with coexisting HF and AF in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to catheter ablation (n = 179) versus pharmacological therapy (n = 184). Two hundred eighty patients were included in this subanalysis (as-treated), 128 of them underwent ablation and 152 received pharmacological treatment. All patients had implanted dual chamber or biventricular implantable defibrillators with activated home monitoring capabilities. The individual AF burden was calculated as the percentage of the atrial arrhythmia time per day. Results: AF burden at baseline was not predictive of the primary endpoint (p = 0.473) or all-cause mortality (p = 0.446). AF recurrence (defined as any episode >30 s) did not show any relationship with the primary endpoints of mortality and occurrence of HF, irrespective of the treatment arm. An AF burden below 50% after 6 months of catheter ablation, was associated with a significant decrease in primary composite outcome (hazard ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.15 to 0.71; p = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.07 to 0.71; p = 0.031). The risk of the primary endpoint or mortality was directly related to a low (<50%) or high (≥50%) AF burden at 6 months post-ablation. Conclusions: AF burden at 6 months was predictive of hard clinical outcomes in HF patients with AF. The first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode >30 s after ablation was not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for HF. (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF [CASTLE-AF]; NCT00643188)

Original languageEnglish
JournalJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 24 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • atrial fibrillation burden
  • heart failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this