Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: A different interpretation-response by Williams et al.

Sheila M. Williams, Bernard J. Venn, Tracy Perry, Rachel Brown, Jim I. Mann, Tim J. Green

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter

Original language	English
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of Nutrition
Volume	103
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510000632
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2010

Cite this

@article{75d0dcf8f1cd4cff9a66f5d6957214d4,

title = "Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: A different interpretation-response by Williams et al.",

author = "Williams, {Sheila M.} and Venn, {Bernard J.} and Tracy Perry and Rachel Brown and Mann, {Jim I.} and Green, {Tim J.}",

year = "2010",

month = "6",

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0007114510000632",

language = "English",

volume = "103",

journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",

issn = "0007-1145",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index

T2 - A different interpretation-response by Williams et al.

AU - Williams, Sheila M.

AU - Venn, Bernard J.

AU - Perry, Tracy

AU - Brown, Rachel

AU - Mann, Jim I.

AU - Green, Tim J.

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953618028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114510000632

DO - 10.1017/S0007114510000632

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:77953618028

VL - 103

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 11

ER -