Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors

Reece Hinchcliff, Johanna Westbrook, David Greenfield, Melissa Baysari, Max Moldovan, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the frequency, style and reliability of newspaper reporting of medication errors. Design. Content analysis of articles discussing medication errors that were published in the 10 most widely read Australian daily newspapers between January 2005 and January 2010. Main outcome measure(s). Newspaper source, article type, article topic, leading news actors, identified causes and solutions of medication errors and cited references. Results. Ninety-two articles included discussion of medication errors, with the one national newspaper, The Australian, the main source of articles (n = 24). News items were the most frequent type of articles (n = 73), with the majority (n = 55) primarily focused on broader hospital problems. Government representatives, advocacy groups, researchers, health service staff and private industry groups were prominent news actors. A shortage of hospital resources was identified as the central cause of medication errors (n = 38), with efficient error reporting systems most frequently identified as a solution (n = 25). Government reports were cited on 39 occasions, with peer-reviewed publications infrequently cited (n = 4). Conclusion. Australian newspaper reporting of medication errors was relatively limited. Given the high prevalence of errors and the potential role consumers can play in identifying and preventing errors, there is a clear argument for increasing public awareness and understanding of issues relating to medication safety. Existing coverage of this issue is unrelated to research evidence. This suggests the need for patient safety researchers and advocacy groups to engage more strongly with the media as a strategy to increase the productive public discourse concerning medication errors and gain support for evidence-based interventions.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbermzr067
Pages1-8
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2012

Keywords

  • Consumer advocacy
  • Medication errors
  • Printed media
  • Public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Hinchcliff, R., Westbrook, J., Greenfield, D., Baysari, M., Moldovan, M., & Braithwaite, J. (2012). Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(1), 1-8. [mzr067]. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzr067
Hinchcliff, Reece ; Westbrook, Johanna ; Greenfield, David ; Baysari, Melissa ; Moldovan, Max ; Braithwaite, Jeffrey. / Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 1-8.
@article{6208589768494a76b2e9512ee2419e1f,
title = "Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors",
abstract = "Objective. To investigate the frequency, style and reliability of newspaper reporting of medication errors. Design. Content analysis of articles discussing medication errors that were published in the 10 most widely read Australian daily newspapers between January 2005 and January 2010. Main outcome measure(s). Newspaper source, article type, article topic, leading news actors, identified causes and solutions of medication errors and cited references. Results. Ninety-two articles included discussion of medication errors, with the one national newspaper, The Australian, the main source of articles (n = 24). News items were the most frequent type of articles (n = 73), with the majority (n = 55) primarily focused on broader hospital problems. Government representatives, advocacy groups, researchers, health service staff and private industry groups were prominent news actors. A shortage of hospital resources was identified as the central cause of medication errors (n = 38), with efficient error reporting systems most frequently identified as a solution (n = 25). Government reports were cited on 39 occasions, with peer-reviewed publications infrequently cited (n = 4). Conclusion. Australian newspaper reporting of medication errors was relatively limited. Given the high prevalence of errors and the potential role consumers can play in identifying and preventing errors, there is a clear argument for increasing public awareness and understanding of issues relating to medication safety. Existing coverage of this issue is unrelated to research evidence. This suggests the need for patient safety researchers and advocacy groups to engage more strongly with the media as a strategy to increase the productive public discourse concerning medication errors and gain support for evidence-based interventions.",
keywords = "Consumer advocacy, Medication errors, Printed media, Public policy",
author = "Reece Hinchcliff and Johanna Westbrook and David Greenfield and Melissa Baysari and Max Moldovan and Jeffrey Braithwaite",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzr067",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Hinchcliff, R, Westbrook, J, Greenfield, D, Baysari, M, Moldovan, M & Braithwaite, J 2012, 'Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors', International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 24, no. 1, mzr067, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzr067

Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors. / Hinchcliff, Reece; Westbrook, Johanna; Greenfield, David; Baysari, Melissa; Moldovan, Max; Braithwaite, Jeffrey.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 24, No. 1, mzr067, 01.02.2012, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of medication errors

AU - Hinchcliff, Reece

AU - Westbrook, Johanna

AU - Greenfield, David

AU - Baysari, Melissa

AU - Moldovan, Max

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Objective. To investigate the frequency, style and reliability of newspaper reporting of medication errors. Design. Content analysis of articles discussing medication errors that were published in the 10 most widely read Australian daily newspapers between January 2005 and January 2010. Main outcome measure(s). Newspaper source, article type, article topic, leading news actors, identified causes and solutions of medication errors and cited references. Results. Ninety-two articles included discussion of medication errors, with the one national newspaper, The Australian, the main source of articles (n = 24). News items were the most frequent type of articles (n = 73), with the majority (n = 55) primarily focused on broader hospital problems. Government representatives, advocacy groups, researchers, health service staff and private industry groups were prominent news actors. A shortage of hospital resources was identified as the central cause of medication errors (n = 38), with efficient error reporting systems most frequently identified as a solution (n = 25). Government reports were cited on 39 occasions, with peer-reviewed publications infrequently cited (n = 4). Conclusion. Australian newspaper reporting of medication errors was relatively limited. Given the high prevalence of errors and the potential role consumers can play in identifying and preventing errors, there is a clear argument for increasing public awareness and understanding of issues relating to medication safety. Existing coverage of this issue is unrelated to research evidence. This suggests the need for patient safety researchers and advocacy groups to engage more strongly with the media as a strategy to increase the productive public discourse concerning medication errors and gain support for evidence-based interventions.

AB - Objective. To investigate the frequency, style and reliability of newspaper reporting of medication errors. Design. Content analysis of articles discussing medication errors that were published in the 10 most widely read Australian daily newspapers between January 2005 and January 2010. Main outcome measure(s). Newspaper source, article type, article topic, leading news actors, identified causes and solutions of medication errors and cited references. Results. Ninety-two articles included discussion of medication errors, with the one national newspaper, The Australian, the main source of articles (n = 24). News items were the most frequent type of articles (n = 73), with the majority (n = 55) primarily focused on broader hospital problems. Government representatives, advocacy groups, researchers, health service staff and private industry groups were prominent news actors. A shortage of hospital resources was identified as the central cause of medication errors (n = 38), with efficient error reporting systems most frequently identified as a solution (n = 25). Government reports were cited on 39 occasions, with peer-reviewed publications infrequently cited (n = 4). Conclusion. Australian newspaper reporting of medication errors was relatively limited. Given the high prevalence of errors and the potential role consumers can play in identifying and preventing errors, there is a clear argument for increasing public awareness and understanding of issues relating to medication safety. Existing coverage of this issue is unrelated to research evidence. This suggests the need for patient safety researchers and advocacy groups to engage more strongly with the media as a strategy to increase the productive public discourse concerning medication errors and gain support for evidence-based interventions.

KW - Consumer advocacy

KW - Medication errors

KW - Printed media

KW - Public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855876127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzr067

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzr067

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

T2 - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 1

M1 - mzr067

ER -