Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument

Gilly A. Hendrie, Megan A. Rebuli, Rebecca K. Golley, Manny Noakes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Methods to address misreporting associated with short dietary assessment instruments are needed. Objective: Our objective was to develop and evaluate the direct and indirect validity of adjustment factors applied to a short dietary assessment instrument to improve estimates of usual consumption of core and discretionary food and beverage intake. Design: Validation of the Short Food Survey relative to 24-hour recalls was performed. The Short Food Survey requires individuals to report their usual intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary choices in multiples of standard servings. Adjustment factors were developed based on a ratio (usual portion size estimated from national data to standard serving size). The estimates of food group intakes (unadjusted and adjusted) were compared to 24-hour recalls. Participants/setting: Three population samples were used in this study. The direct validation used data from 61 Australian adults (collected 2013–2014). The indirect validation compared data from the 2011–2013 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n=9,435) to a sample of 145,975 who completed the Short Food Survey in a format that is freely available online (2015–2016). Main outcome measures: Food group intake (in servings) was measured. Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Direct validation showed the adjustment factors improved the survey-derived estimates of intake for all food groups except grain foods. For grains, the mean difference went from –0.6 servings to +1.2 to 1.5 servings. The absolute difference in food group intake between the adjusted Short Food Survey and recalls remained statistically significant for fruit, meat, dairy, and grains, but was not different for vegetables and discretionary foods. The indirect validation showed that the adjusted estimates of intake from the online Short Food Survey were closer to the population estimates reported by 24-hour recall for all food groups except meat. Conclusions: Adjustment factors can improve estimates of food group intake assessed using a short dietary assessment instrument for some but not all food groups.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1864-1873
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Volume118
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Food intake
  • Misreporting
  • Short dietary instrument
  • Statistical adjustment
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Hendrie, Gilly A. ; Rebuli, Megan A. ; Golley, Rebecca K. ; Noakes, Manny. / Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument. In: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2018 ; Vol. 118, No. 10. pp. 1864-1873.
@article{e842441831734e6db8089222a067ad32,
title = "Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument",
abstract = "Background: Methods to address misreporting associated with short dietary assessment instruments are needed. Objective: Our objective was to develop and evaluate the direct and indirect validity of adjustment factors applied to a short dietary assessment instrument to improve estimates of usual consumption of core and discretionary food and beverage intake. Design: Validation of the Short Food Survey relative to 24-hour recalls was performed. The Short Food Survey requires individuals to report their usual intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary choices in multiples of standard servings. Adjustment factors were developed based on a ratio (usual portion size estimated from national data to standard serving size). The estimates of food group intakes (unadjusted and adjusted) were compared to 24-hour recalls. Participants/setting: Three population samples were used in this study. The direct validation used data from 61 Australian adults (collected 2013–2014). The indirect validation compared data from the 2011–2013 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n=9,435) to a sample of 145,975 who completed the Short Food Survey in a format that is freely available online (2015–2016). Main outcome measures: Food group intake (in servings) was measured. Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Direct validation showed the adjustment factors improved the survey-derived estimates of intake for all food groups except grain foods. For grains, the mean difference went from –0.6 servings to +1.2 to 1.5 servings. The absolute difference in food group intake between the adjusted Short Food Survey and recalls remained statistically significant for fruit, meat, dairy, and grains, but was not different for vegetables and discretionary foods. The indirect validation showed that the adjusted estimates of intake from the online Short Food Survey were closer to the population estimates reported by 24-hour recall for all food groups except meat. Conclusions: Adjustment factors can improve estimates of food group intake assessed using a short dietary assessment instrument for some but not all food groups.",
keywords = "Food intake, Misreporting, Short dietary instrument, Statistical adjustment, Surveillance",
author = "Hendrie, {Gilly A.} and Rebuli, {Megan A.} and Golley, {Rebecca K.} and Manny Noakes",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "1864--1873",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument. / Hendrie, Gilly A.; Rebuli, Megan A.; Golley, Rebecca K.; Noakes, Manny.

In: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 118, No. 10, 01.10.2018, p. 1864-1873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument

AU - Hendrie, Gilly A.

AU - Rebuli, Megan A.

AU - Golley, Rebecca K.

AU - Noakes, Manny

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Background: Methods to address misreporting associated with short dietary assessment instruments are needed. Objective: Our objective was to develop and evaluate the direct and indirect validity of adjustment factors applied to a short dietary assessment instrument to improve estimates of usual consumption of core and discretionary food and beverage intake. Design: Validation of the Short Food Survey relative to 24-hour recalls was performed. The Short Food Survey requires individuals to report their usual intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary choices in multiples of standard servings. Adjustment factors were developed based on a ratio (usual portion size estimated from national data to standard serving size). The estimates of food group intakes (unadjusted and adjusted) were compared to 24-hour recalls. Participants/setting: Three population samples were used in this study. The direct validation used data from 61 Australian adults (collected 2013–2014). The indirect validation compared data from the 2011–2013 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n=9,435) to a sample of 145,975 who completed the Short Food Survey in a format that is freely available online (2015–2016). Main outcome measures: Food group intake (in servings) was measured. Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Direct validation showed the adjustment factors improved the survey-derived estimates of intake for all food groups except grain foods. For grains, the mean difference went from –0.6 servings to +1.2 to 1.5 servings. The absolute difference in food group intake between the adjusted Short Food Survey and recalls remained statistically significant for fruit, meat, dairy, and grains, but was not different for vegetables and discretionary foods. The indirect validation showed that the adjusted estimates of intake from the online Short Food Survey were closer to the population estimates reported by 24-hour recall for all food groups except meat. Conclusions: Adjustment factors can improve estimates of food group intake assessed using a short dietary assessment instrument for some but not all food groups.

AB - Background: Methods to address misreporting associated with short dietary assessment instruments are needed. Objective: Our objective was to develop and evaluate the direct and indirect validity of adjustment factors applied to a short dietary assessment instrument to improve estimates of usual consumption of core and discretionary food and beverage intake. Design: Validation of the Short Food Survey relative to 24-hour recalls was performed. The Short Food Survey requires individuals to report their usual intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary choices in multiples of standard servings. Adjustment factors were developed based on a ratio (usual portion size estimated from national data to standard serving size). The estimates of food group intakes (unadjusted and adjusted) were compared to 24-hour recalls. Participants/setting: Three population samples were used in this study. The direct validation used data from 61 Australian adults (collected 2013–2014). The indirect validation compared data from the 2011–2013 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n=9,435) to a sample of 145,975 who completed the Short Food Survey in a format that is freely available online (2015–2016). Main outcome measures: Food group intake (in servings) was measured. Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Direct validation showed the adjustment factors improved the survey-derived estimates of intake for all food groups except grain foods. For grains, the mean difference went from –0.6 servings to +1.2 to 1.5 servings. The absolute difference in food group intake between the adjusted Short Food Survey and recalls remained statistically significant for fruit, meat, dairy, and grains, but was not different for vegetables and discretionary foods. The indirect validation showed that the adjusted estimates of intake from the online Short Food Survey were closer to the population estimates reported by 24-hour recall for all food groups except meat. Conclusions: Adjustment factors can improve estimates of food group intake assessed using a short dietary assessment instrument for some but not all food groups.

KW - Food intake

KW - Misreporting

KW - Short dietary instrument

KW - Statistical adjustment

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046376225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 1864

EP - 1873

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

T2 - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

IS - 10

ER -