Accuracy of the random glucose test as screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

Marsha Van Leeuwen, Brent C. Opmeer, Yildirim Yilmaz, Jacqueline Limpens, Mireille J. Serlie, Ben Willem J Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although not formally supported by guidelines, random glucose testing (RGT) is frequently used to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Results on test accuracy are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and calculate summary estimates of accuracy measures of RGT as screening test for GDM. Study design: Systematic review to identify studies comparing RGT to oral glucose tolerance testing before 32 weeks of pregnancy. A systematic search without language restrictions was performed in MEDLINE (1950 till April 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2008). Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures were summary estimates of test accuracy of RGT. Results: Six studies were included, reporting on 3537 women. Due to the small number of studies and heterogeneity, no summary estimates of test accuracy were calculated. Reported sensitivities and specificities of individual studies varied. For 100% sensitivity, specificity was around 40%. For sensitivity of 60% specificity was at most 80%. When specificity approached 100%, sensitivity dropped to 20-30%. Conclusion: Available evidence on the accuracy of RGT to test for GDM is limited. Based on studies in our systematic review, we consider single random glucose measurement inadequate to screen for GDM.

LanguageEnglish
Pages130-135
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume154
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Random glucose test
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Van Leeuwen, Marsha ; Opmeer, Brent C. ; Yilmaz, Yildirim ; Limpens, Jacqueline ; Serlie, Mireille J. ; Mol, Ben Willem J. / Accuracy of the random glucose test as screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus : A systematic review. In: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2011 ; Vol. 154, No. 2. pp. 130-135.
@article{88fb8ab8e23140e5bc9c05eb16bde2e4,
title = "Accuracy of the random glucose test as screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: Although not formally supported by guidelines, random glucose testing (RGT) is frequently used to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Results on test accuracy are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and calculate summary estimates of accuracy measures of RGT as screening test for GDM. Study design: Systematic review to identify studies comparing RGT to oral glucose tolerance testing before 32 weeks of pregnancy. A systematic search without language restrictions was performed in MEDLINE (1950 till April 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2008). Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures were summary estimates of test accuracy of RGT. Results: Six studies were included, reporting on 3537 women. Due to the small number of studies and heterogeneity, no summary estimates of test accuracy were calculated. Reported sensitivities and specificities of individual studies varied. For 100{\%} sensitivity, specificity was around 40{\%}. For sensitivity of 60{\%} specificity was at most 80{\%}. When specificity approached 100{\%}, sensitivity dropped to 20-30{\%}. Conclusion: Available evidence on the accuracy of RGT to test for GDM is limited. Based on studies in our systematic review, we consider single random glucose measurement inadequate to screen for GDM.",
keywords = "Gestational diabetes mellitus, Random glucose test, Screening",
author = "{Van Leeuwen}, Marsha and Opmeer, {Brent C.} and Yildirim Yilmaz and Jacqueline Limpens and Serlie, {Mireille J.} and Mol, {Ben Willem J}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "154",
pages = "130--135",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0301-2115",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Accuracy of the random glucose test as screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus : A systematic review. / Van Leeuwen, Marsha; Opmeer, Brent C.; Yilmaz, Yildirim; Limpens, Jacqueline; Serlie, Mireille J.; Mol, Ben Willem J.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 154, No. 2, 01.01.2011, p. 130-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of the random glucose test as screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus

T2 - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

AU - Van Leeuwen, Marsha

AU - Opmeer, Brent C.

AU - Yilmaz, Yildirim

AU - Limpens, Jacqueline

AU - Serlie, Mireille J.

AU - Mol, Ben Willem J

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objective: Although not formally supported by guidelines, random glucose testing (RGT) is frequently used to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Results on test accuracy are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and calculate summary estimates of accuracy measures of RGT as screening test for GDM. Study design: Systematic review to identify studies comparing RGT to oral glucose tolerance testing before 32 weeks of pregnancy. A systematic search without language restrictions was performed in MEDLINE (1950 till April 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2008). Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures were summary estimates of test accuracy of RGT. Results: Six studies were included, reporting on 3537 women. Due to the small number of studies and heterogeneity, no summary estimates of test accuracy were calculated. Reported sensitivities and specificities of individual studies varied. For 100% sensitivity, specificity was around 40%. For sensitivity of 60% specificity was at most 80%. When specificity approached 100%, sensitivity dropped to 20-30%. Conclusion: Available evidence on the accuracy of RGT to test for GDM is limited. Based on studies in our systematic review, we consider single random glucose measurement inadequate to screen for GDM.

AB - Objective: Although not formally supported by guidelines, random glucose testing (RGT) is frequently used to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Results on test accuracy are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and calculate summary estimates of accuracy measures of RGT as screening test for GDM. Study design: Systematic review to identify studies comparing RGT to oral glucose tolerance testing before 32 weeks of pregnancy. A systematic search without language restrictions was performed in MEDLINE (1950 till April 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2008). Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures were summary estimates of test accuracy of RGT. Results: Six studies were included, reporting on 3537 women. Due to the small number of studies and heterogeneity, no summary estimates of test accuracy were calculated. Reported sensitivities and specificities of individual studies varied. For 100% sensitivity, specificity was around 40%. For sensitivity of 60% specificity was at most 80%. When specificity approached 100%, sensitivity dropped to 20-30%. Conclusion: Available evidence on the accuracy of RGT to test for GDM is limited. Based on studies in our systematic review, we consider single random glucose measurement inadequate to screen for GDM.

KW - Gestational diabetes mellitus

KW - Random glucose test

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951509429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 154

SP - 130

EP - 135

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0301-2115

IS - 2

ER -