A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]

Jeffrey Braithwaite, Johanna Westbrook, Marjorie Pawsey, David Greenfield, Justine Naylor, Rick Iedema, Bill Runciman, Sally Redman, Christine Jorm, Maureen Robinson, Sally Nathan, Robert Gibberd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Accreditation has become ubiquitous across the international health care landscape. Award of full accreditation status in health care is viewed, as it is in other sectors, as a valid indicator of high quality organisational performance. However, few studies have empirically demonstrated this assertion. The value of accreditation, therefore, remains uncertain, and this persists as a central legitimacy problem for accreditation providers, policymakers and researchers. The question arises as to how best to research the validity, impact and value of accreditation processes in health care. Most health care organisations participate in some sort of accreditation process and thus it is not possible to study its merits using a randomised controlled strategy. Further, tools and processes for accreditation and organisational performance are multifaceted. Methods/design: To understand the relationship between them a multi-method research approach is required which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative data. The generic nature of accreditation standard development and inspection within different sectors enhances the extent to which the findings of in-depth study of accreditation process in one industry can be generalised to other industries. This paper presents a research design which comprises a prospective, multi-method, multilevel, multi-disciplinary approach to assess the validity, impact and value of accreditation. Discussion: The accreditation program which assesses over 1,000 health services in Australia is used as an exemplar for testing this design. The paper proposes this design as a framework suitable for application to future international research into accreditation. Our aim is to stimulate debate on the role of accreditation and how to research it.

LanguageEnglish
Article number113
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Braithwaite, Jeffrey ; Westbrook, Johanna ; Pawsey, Marjorie ; Greenfield, David ; Naylor, Justine ; Iedema, Rick ; Runciman, Bill ; Redman, Sally ; Jorm, Christine ; Robinson, Maureen ; Nathan, Sally ; Gibberd, Robert. / A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2006 ; Vol. 6.
@article{f049d5bf2d88464baf7457d49766046c,
title = "A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]",
abstract = "Background: Accreditation has become ubiquitous across the international health care landscape. Award of full accreditation status in health care is viewed, as it is in other sectors, as a valid indicator of high quality organisational performance. However, few studies have empirically demonstrated this assertion. The value of accreditation, therefore, remains uncertain, and this persists as a central legitimacy problem for accreditation providers, policymakers and researchers. The question arises as to how best to research the validity, impact and value of accreditation processes in health care. Most health care organisations participate in some sort of accreditation process and thus it is not possible to study its merits using a randomised controlled strategy. Further, tools and processes for accreditation and organisational performance are multifaceted. Methods/design: To understand the relationship between them a multi-method research approach is required which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative data. The generic nature of accreditation standard development and inspection within different sectors enhances the extent to which the findings of in-depth study of accreditation process in one industry can be generalised to other industries. This paper presents a research design which comprises a prospective, multi-method, multilevel, multi-disciplinary approach to assess the validity, impact and value of accreditation. Discussion: The accreditation program which assesses over 1,000 health services in Australia is used as an exemplar for testing this design. The paper proposes this design as a framework suitable for application to future international research into accreditation. Our aim is to stimulate debate on the role of accreditation and how to research it.",
author = "Jeffrey Braithwaite and Johanna Westbrook and Marjorie Pawsey and David Greenfield and Justine Naylor and Rick Iedema and Bill Runciman and Sally Redman and Christine Jorm and Maureen Robinson and Sally Nathan and Robert Gibberd",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-6-113",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMC health services research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]. / Braithwaite, Jeffrey; Westbrook, Johanna; Pawsey, Marjorie; Greenfield, David; Naylor, Justine; Iedema, Rick; Runciman, Bill; Redman, Sally; Jorm, Christine; Robinson, Maureen; Nathan, Sally; Gibberd, Robert.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 6, 113, 12.09.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

AU - Westbrook, Johanna

AU - Pawsey, Marjorie

AU - Greenfield, David

AU - Naylor, Justine

AU - Iedema, Rick

AU - Runciman, Bill

AU - Redman, Sally

AU - Jorm, Christine

AU - Robinson, Maureen

AU - Nathan, Sally

AU - Gibberd, Robert

PY - 2006/9/12

Y1 - 2006/9/12

N2 - Background: Accreditation has become ubiquitous across the international health care landscape. Award of full accreditation status in health care is viewed, as it is in other sectors, as a valid indicator of high quality organisational performance. However, few studies have empirically demonstrated this assertion. The value of accreditation, therefore, remains uncertain, and this persists as a central legitimacy problem for accreditation providers, policymakers and researchers. The question arises as to how best to research the validity, impact and value of accreditation processes in health care. Most health care organisations participate in some sort of accreditation process and thus it is not possible to study its merits using a randomised controlled strategy. Further, tools and processes for accreditation and organisational performance are multifaceted. Methods/design: To understand the relationship between them a multi-method research approach is required which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative data. The generic nature of accreditation standard development and inspection within different sectors enhances the extent to which the findings of in-depth study of accreditation process in one industry can be generalised to other industries. This paper presents a research design which comprises a prospective, multi-method, multilevel, multi-disciplinary approach to assess the validity, impact and value of accreditation. Discussion: The accreditation program which assesses over 1,000 health services in Australia is used as an exemplar for testing this design. The paper proposes this design as a framework suitable for application to future international research into accreditation. Our aim is to stimulate debate on the role of accreditation and how to research it.

AB - Background: Accreditation has become ubiquitous across the international health care landscape. Award of full accreditation status in health care is viewed, as it is in other sectors, as a valid indicator of high quality organisational performance. However, few studies have empirically demonstrated this assertion. The value of accreditation, therefore, remains uncertain, and this persists as a central legitimacy problem for accreditation providers, policymakers and researchers. The question arises as to how best to research the validity, impact and value of accreditation processes in health care. Most health care organisations participate in some sort of accreditation process and thus it is not possible to study its merits using a randomised controlled strategy. Further, tools and processes for accreditation and organisational performance are multifaceted. Methods/design: To understand the relationship between them a multi-method research approach is required which incorporates both quantitative and qualitative data. The generic nature of accreditation standard development and inspection within different sectors enhances the extent to which the findings of in-depth study of accreditation process in one industry can be generalised to other industries. This paper presents a research design which comprises a prospective, multi-method, multilevel, multi-disciplinary approach to assess the validity, impact and value of accreditation. Discussion: The accreditation program which assesses over 1,000 health services in Australia is used as an exemplar for testing this design. The paper proposes this design as a framework suitable for application to future international research into accreditation. Our aim is to stimulate debate on the role of accreditation and how to research it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749346390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-6-113

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-6-113

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - BMC health services research

T2 - BMC health services research

JF - BMC health services research

SN - 1472-6963

M1 - 113

ER -